Spencer here: My
uptown review of Passing Strange doesnÕt have much to add to the
observations made by my fellow Aisle
Sayer, Richard Gleaves, in his downtown review (duplicated
below) last
season, when the show debuted at the Public Theatre. So now that it has
moved
uptown to the Belasco (on the strength of not many, but rather a few
well-positioned, good reviews), IÕll say my piece in brief.
The
story of Afro-American rock composer/performer/musician StewÕs formative years as a young man is
not one that
cries out for musical dramatization. Since heÕs a witty and worthy
show-biz
pro, the autobiographical, semi-concert happening he created for the
purpose
has its moments of flash, insight and pithy humor. But theyÕre
overshadowed by
the whole, which is the kind of self-referential, self-indulgent thing
that is
often pumped out by people unschooled in musical theatre writing,
containing
in-jokes and asides to emphasize how
unschooled they are (by way of implying that weÕre going someplace new
simply
because basic principles of craft arenÕt in the toolbox) as if to make
ignoranceÑall right, call it naiveteÑa virtue. Which in this
context it never is.
ItÕs
a familiar tactic, but if it doesnÕt seem so, thatÕs because most shows
employing it rarely emerge from the rigors of screening by initial
readers, or
the exposure of developmental steps like readings and workshops. Those
of us in
the game see a lot of them; the public and most criticsÑnot so much.
The
odd one that actually emerges into the light every five or ten years
tends to
emphasize why the others remain obscure.
As
to why these exceptions find their proponents? Well, the innate
pretension of
artiness can be a fooler. And not knowing the difference between
pretension and
innovation has always been one of the great recipes for delusion. More
than
that I wonÕt say.
Let
this re-post of Mr. Gleaves say the restÉ
*************
It occurred to me, going
into the task of writing this review,
that I should be prepared to decipher the meaning of Passing
Strange.
Not the meaning of the show -- the
question I have been flummoxed to answer is why this piece should have
that
particular title. What does it mean? What does that title have to do
with this
show? I felt if I could explain the title I would know how to frame the
review.
I
was right.
I
knew vaguely that the phrase was from Shakespeare, but from what
specifically I
couldn't remember -- so I did a little detective work. (Fortunately,
these days
"detective work" means a two-minute Google search.)
Aha!
From
Othello:
"When
I did speak of some distressful stroke, That my youth suffer'd, My
story being
done, She gave me for my pains a world of sighs: She swore, in faith,
'twas
strange, 'twas passing strange, 'Twas pitiful, 'twas wondrous
pitiful..."
Othello
is describing his wooing of Desdemona. Apparently, he poured his heart
out to
her about his awful youth -- saying, in effect: "Poor me. My life
sucked" -- and "Passing Strange" was her reply
("passing" means "exceedingly").
Is
it my imagination or does she sound bored?
Poor
Desdemona. I sympathize! Who wants to listen to somebody else's
childhood
angst? Not good date conversation. I see her in a modern-dress
production,
sitting across from Othello in a restaurant, looking around the room
while he
prattles about his childhood, checking her watch and looking for an
opportunity
to bolt. She turns to Othello occasionally, says "passing strange"
(as you or I would say "that's nice"), then looks longingly at the
nearest door. Okay -- you know where this review is going.
Passing
Strange
wants to be a
semi-autobiographical tale about the author Stew's journey from youth
to adulthood.
However, since the show only dramatizes a small part of that journey,
it is
actually about his path from suburban youth to
suburban-youth-with-more-stamps-on-his-passport. Raised in suburban Los
Angeles, Young Stew (in the program billed pretentiously as "Youth")
discovers music at the local church, decides to see the world and
finally comes
back bitter (though drug-experienced and sexually satiated) to find
that his
mother has died in his absence. Just in case this synopsis sounds like
a complete
dramatic arc, I will emphasize that the mother's offstage death comes
out of
the blue, and that the play is really more concerned with Stew's
discovery of
hash and three-ways.
Biography
as source material is problematic even in the best of situations. Even
when
dealing with a life story that is inherently dramatic (such as
Einstein's or
Nixon's) the onus is still on the author to wrest some narrative shape
from the
events of a messy life: to make the climax seem inevitable even though
the
events were actually lived in sequence without an eye to any end.
Dramatizing
one's own biography is an even greater challenge because it dares you
to find
the universal in yourself, to take the particular concretes of your
life and
abstract them into something meaningful to others.
It
requires objectivity about one's own mistakes.
Passing
Strange has
flashes
of this insight, moments when the author seems on the verge of some
realization, but it never quite reaches the point of saying anything
definite.
Dramatically, it seems incapable of coming to any universal point.
Stew, who
acts as narrator, actually breaks character to address the audience
late in Act
Two -- to give them not his own conclusion about what it all means but
what a
pretzel vendor who sat in on the dress rehearsal thought it meant. I've
never
seen a more blatant abdication of a writer's responsibility.
Musically,
the score by Stew and Heidi Rodewald is energetic but
unexpressive. It is the kind of
thumping rock that confuses repetition with development. There are some
lovely
textures and some visceral jolts, but the only memorable musical
numbers are
the few half-hearted attempts at pastiche -- as in the Act Two Chorus
Line
parody "The Black One". To listen to them is to
listen to a
rock musician discover how deceptively hard it is to write a song with
a tune,
a hook and a dramatic structure.
There
are, nonetheless, a few things to admire in this production. The
stellar cast
deserve all the applause they get -- particularly Daniel Breaker and Colman Domingo who share some nice
moments. The four
onstage musicians are virtuosic. The physical production directed by Annie
Dorsen is
remarkably
theatrical and was enough to keep my interest even as the story was
losing my
sympathy.
But
theater is still a storyteller's medium and the story here is too
slight to
deserve the riches of the production. My theatergoing companion summed
it up --
leaving at intermission he remarked: "It's about how that guy ('Youth')
turned into that guy (Stew). And I don't care." Neither did I,
ultimately.
And neither will you. "'Twas strange, 'twas passing strange..." was
only the first part of Desdemona's response.
The
next bit was:
"Twas
pitiful, 'twas wondrous pitiful..."